Dear HR Executive:
If you missed yesterday's (3/30/09) Wall Street Journal editorial on the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA), you should check it out. To date we haven't heard a stronger case for defeating EFCA.
The gist of the WSJ argument is that the "card check" provision in EFCA is unconstitutional. Card check is of course a method for employees to unionize when a majority of employees at a company publicly sign authorization forms, or "cards," stating they wish to be represented by the union. The WSJ says that violates workers' constitutional right to "anonymous speech" (currently the yes/no decision is made by secret ballot).
The main point the anti-EFCA forces have made thus far is that workers who oppose unionization will cave in and vote yes because they'll fear being ostracized or even physically harmed. Given the violent history of the American labor movement, this argument certainly has merit.
But the WSJ article takes it a step further and says that forcing a worker to vote publicly is a violation of that person's constitutional rights: "Sanctioning -- and thereby promoting -- demands that employees publicly disclose how they feel about unionization clearly violates their First Amendment entitlement to vote and practice their speech privately."
EFCA advocates will claim that a worker can simply abstain from voting, but that misses the point. On the shop floor an abstention will be viewed as a "no" and potentially subject the worker to retaliatory threats and abuse. Those who favor EFCA have a significant hurdle to overcome: If voting is public, how do you protect the rights of workers who 1) don't want to be in a union and 2) feel their opinion on this issue is nobody's business but their own?
If card check is in fact anti-constitutional, and if EFCA passes, we'd see a wave of lawsuits filed by workers who claimed that their First Amendment and privacy rights were violated. How ugly would that be? The mere thought of it might make legislators think twice.
Here again is the link to the WSJ article.
Please share your thoughts by clicking on "comments" below.
Stephen Meyer
B21 Publisher
UPCOMING AUDIO CONFERENCE: Don't miss B21’s upcoming audio conference, "Personal Accountability: How Supervisors Can Get Workers to “Own” Their Jobs and Their Results." Why are some supervisors better than others at achieving goals? They all have the same motivational tools at their disposal: They can give employees raises, promotions and nonmonetary rewards when deserved. They can all use the performance review process to provide positive feedback and fire people up. But why do the best managers dramatically outperform the rest? What’s their secret? Two words – personal accountability. Great supervisors have a unique talent for tapping in to an employee’s sense of personal accountability to achieve goals. On Thursday, April 9, our speaker, Valerie Grubb, will lay out six steps successful supervisors can use to instill personal accountability in their direct reports.